Should journalists be emotionally involved in their stories?

The issue of whether reporters should be emotionally involved in the stories they air is an ongoing debate. Different arguers have different opinions and views on this question. As normal humans, journalists have emotions and are justified in expressing emotional attachment to their stories. Journalists should be permitted to be humans!

However, objectivity and impartiality are crucial principles of journalism that reporters must uphold. Their main role is to feed the masses with accurate and unprejudiced information. When emotionally attached to their stories, reporters can portray personal biases or influence the framing of the story they are broadcasting. Lack of objectivity and biasness can lower the populace’s trust in the media.

Emotional involvement can result in ethical issues in journalism. Reporters are responsible for airing stories as they are to maintain their reliability and credibility. Being emotional when reporting a story can present an imbalanced perspective making it difficult for the journalist to cover a fair representation of different viewpoints. In addition, emotional involvement may affect the language, tone, and selection of details in storytelling. Though this can augment the emotional impact on the audience, it can impel the reporter to risk the prioritization or sensationalism of emotional appeal over the reality or accuracy of the story.     

However, it is worth noting that emotional involvement in storytelling can enhance empathy and human connection. Reporters can empathize with the people they base their stories on, enabling them to comprehend and express their experiences to the viewers or listeners. Nonetheless, if a journalist cannot help to be emotionally attached to a story, it is important, to be honest and transparent. They should disclose any personal conflicts of interest, partialities, or connections they may have to help the audience consider their perception when interpreting the story.